Property vs shares calculator

Compare an Australian investment property with a diversified ETF portfolio using the same starting and ongoing cash. See how growth, income, borrowing, costs and tax could affect your long-term outcome.

General information only. Results are estimates and aren't personal financial, tax or legal advice.
Read the important information

Your estimated result

Tax rules
Includes the CGT and negative gearing settings used in this comparison. Only the tax treatment changes: returns, costs and financing stay the same.

After 20 years, property $986,509, ETF portfolio $1,216,492. ETF portfolio has the higher estimated value, ahead by $229,983.

After 20 years

Property$987k$986,509 after debt, selling costs and tax
ETF portfolio$1.22m$1,216,492 after tax
Estimated differenceETF portfolio +$230,000

An estimate under the assumptions you’ve selected, not a prediction or recommendation.

Tax paid Property tax on rent is paid out of your own pocket as you go, so it forms part of the cash contributed. ETF tax on distributions is deducted inside the portfolio before the rest is reinvested. Both options are then taxed again on the gain when they are sold.PropertyETF portfolio
During the investment−$4,665$137,694
On exit (CGT)$40,204$110,730
Total tax$35,539$248,425

A negative figure means the property was negatively geared, so rental losses reduced the tax paid on your other income.

Total cash contributedtoday's dollarsThe deposit, buying costs and every later payment the property requires. The ETF option receives exactly the same cash, so both start from the same commitment.
$561,867

The deposit, buying costs and every later payment. Both options receive exactly this cash, so the difference above is what each one does with it.

Estimated property cash required in year one: $31,404 (about $2,617 per month). The same cash is invested into the ETF portfolio.

Shown in today's dollars — what these amounts would buy at today's prices.Future dollars are the amounts you would actually see on a statement in 20 years. Today’s dollars adjust those amounts back to what they would buy now, using your 2.5% inflation assumption. On that basis a dollar received at the end is worth about 61 cents in today’s money.

Before you read anything into this

General information only. This calculator doesn’t consider your objectives, financial situation or needs, and it isn’t personal financial, tax or legal advice.

These are not comparable risks. One leveraged property is being compared with a diversified portfolio. They differ in volatility, liquidity, diversification, transaction costs, and how much of your wealth sits in a single asset. None of that is modelled here.

An estimate, not a forecast. Small changes to growth, rates or tax can reverse the result. Actual outcomes will differ. .

Estimated value over time

PropertyETF portfolioCash contributed
Projected after tax values in today's dollars. Property finishes at $986,509 and the ETF portfolio at $1,216,492.$0$304k$608k$912k$1.22mYear 0Year 10Year 20

The cash you put in

Deposit and buying costs$250,000
Rental income received+$886,177
Loan repayments($1,151,137)
Running costs($413,377)
Tax saved by negative gearing+$7,644
Total cash contributedactual dollars paid$920,694

That is about $561,867 in today’s dollars, the basis used in the result above.

That is about $2,617 a month in year one, averaging $2,795 a month and peaking at $3,246. The ETF option receives exactly the same cash, so it isn’t the starting amount compounding by itself.

What the property is worth at the end

Purchase price$1,000,000
Capital growth+$1,191,123
Sale value$2,191,123
Less loan remaining($432,029)
Less selling costs($76,689)
Less CGT on sale($65,879)
Estimated value after tax$1,616,526

Rent, interest, running costs and tax during ownership are already settled in the cash table above, so they change how much you contribute rather than the ending value.

What the ETF portfolio is worth at the end

Starting investment (deposit and buying costs avoided)$250,000
Cash matched from the property+$670,694
Investment growth, after 0.75% all-in fees+$901,228
Distributions received+$578,539
Less tax on distributions($225,630)
Less CGT on the final sale($181,447)
Estimated value after tax$1,993,384

Fees are deducted inside the growth rate rather than as a separate cash payment, and tax on distributions is taken before the rest is reinvested.

If neither investment is sold

Property equity before selling costs and final CGT$1,759,094
ETF balance before final CGT$2,174,830

This view may be useful if you plan to keep holding. It isn’t an after-tax comparison because both investments still contain unrealised gains and may be taxed when eventually sold.

Assumptions behind this result

  • 4% nominal property growth
  • 1.46% implied real growth
  • 3.43% rent after vacancy
  • 1.6% first-year property costs, then inflation
  • 6% average interest, principal and interest
  • 5% buying and 3.5% selling costs
  • 5.2% nominal ETF capital growth
  • 2.8% income yield, 0.75% all-in fees
  • 7.25% total return after fees
  • 2.5% inflation, 39% marginal tax rate
  • Transitional CGT rules, 20 years held
  • Purchased 28 October 2026

Break-even growth

Property capital growth needed to finish level5.3% p.a.
ETF capital growth needed to finish level3.1% p.a.

3.1% ETF capital growth is about 5.2% total return after fees, using the current income and fee assumptions. Both figures hold every other assumption constant.

If growth is 1% different

  • Property growth 1% lower ETF ahead$682,515
  • Your assumptions ETF ahead$376,858
  • Property growth 1% higher ETF ahead$100,626
  • ETF growth 1% lower ETF ahead$182,710
  • ETF growth 1% higher ETF ahead$603,007

These scenarios change one growth assumption at a time. They show sensitivity, not a predicted range.

Compare the rules without overlooking the cash

Rules from 1 July 2027
Cash contributed$920,694
Property value$1,616,526
ETF value$1,993,384
Property above cash paid$695,832
ETF above cash paid$1,072,690
Previous rules
Cash contributed$807,295
Property value$1,474,841
ETF value$1,761,012
Property above cash paid$667,546
ETF above cash paid$953,718

Changing the tax treatment changes the property’s after tax shortfall, and because that shortfall is matched into the ETF, the total cash contributed can differ between scenarios. The ending values alone aren’t directly comparable, so the last two rows deduct the cash contributed.

When each option pays tax

Property: tax on rental income during ownership−$7,644 (negatively geared)
Property: CGT on sale$65,879
Property: total tax$58,236
ETF: tax on distributions during the investment$225,630
ETF: CGT on the final sale$181,447
ETF: total tax$407,077

Property tax on rent is paid out of pocket, so it is part of the cash contributed. ETF tax on distributions is deducted inside the portfolio before the rest is reinvested. Land tax and other state charges sit in the property running costs rather than in these figures.

Tax settings used

CGT method used at saleTransitional CGT rules
Marginal tax rate used39%
Minimum CGT rate on post-transition gains30%
Property value used at 1 July 2027$1,026,768 at that date

Negative gearing

The result uses $290,767 of quarantined rental losses to reduce residential capital gains before CGT. No quarantined loss remains after the sale.

Investment property defaults

$1,000,000 property and 20% deposit. This gives the calculator a simple Australian property example with meaningful leverage. The deposit is fully adjustable and the model gives the ETF the same upfront cash including buying costs.

LMI below a 20% deposit. A low deposit may attract lenders mortgage insurance. If you enter an LMI amount, it is treated as a one-off premium added to the loan. It is not increased with inflation each year and any tax deduction for borrowing expenses is not modelled.

4% nominal property capital growth. This includes inflation and excludes rental income. At the 2.5% inflation default it represents about 1.46% real capital growth. Inflation isn’t added to the property value again.

3.5% gross rental yield and 2% vacancy. Rental income is separate from capital growth. The calculator reduces gross rent by the vacancy allowance, giving a 3.43% first year rental yield after vacancy under the defaults. Rent then increases with inflation.

1.6% first-year property costs. The simple default starts at $16,000 for a $1,000,000 property and then grows with inflation. You can instead build the allowance from maintenance, rates and insurance, management, strata and land tax. Land tax varies materially by state, land value, ownership and other holdings.

5.83% indicative first-year property return after ongoing costs. Under the defaults this is 4% capital growth plus 3.43% rent after vacancy, less 1.6% first-year property costs. It is before mortgage interest and tax, which are modelled separately based on the investor’s financing and tax assumptions. Rent and ongoing property costs then grow with inflation, so changing the property capital growth assumption doesn’t mechanically change the dollar holding costs.

6% average mortgage rate. The calculator uses one long term average rate rather than trying to predict future rate changes. You can select principal and interest, interest only, or an initial interest only period followed by principal and interest.

Optional major works. You can add two renovation, refurbishment or capital works payments by year and amount. The ETF receives the same cash, and the works are added to the property’s CGT cost base as the fourth element. Any resulting increase in the property’s market value isn’t modelled. Confirm your own treatment with tax advice.

5% buying costs and 3.5% selling costs. These are broad allowances for costs such as stamp duty, conveyancing, inspections, agent commission and marketing. Stamp duty is usually one of the largest buying costs and varies significantly by state.

State and territory taxes

Buying costs and land tax are the two assumptions that vary most by where you buy. The calculator uses one national default for each rather than changing them when you pick a location, because both depend on more than the state. Use the figures below to set your own under More assumptions.

Stamp duty. Indicative general transfer duty on a $1,000,000 investment property, on standard non-owner-occupier rates available in August 2026. It excludes concessions, foreign purchaser surcharges and special circumstances, and duty is charged on a sliding scale, so these figures don’t scale with the price you entered above. The 5% buying costs default also has to cover conveyancing, inspections and loan costs, so it is comfortable in the ACT, Queensland, New South Wales, Tasmania and Western Australia, and tight in South Australia and the Northern Territory. In Victoria, duty alone exceeds it, so raise the figure if you are buying there.

Indicative stamp duty on a $1,000,000 investment property
StateDuty on $1m% of price
NSW$39,1873.92%
VIC$55,0005.5%
QLD$38,0253.8%
WA$42,6164.26%
SA$48,8304.88%
TAS$40,1854.02%
ACT$36,9503.69%
NT$49,5004.95%

Land tax. Land tax is charged annually on the unimproved land value, not on what you paid, so a $1,000,000 apartment and a $1,000,000 house on a large block can attract very different amounts. Land is aggregated across everything you own in that jurisdiction, so a second property can push the first over the threshold, and rates differ again for trusts, companies and foreign owners. To convert an estimate into the calculator’s input: annual land tax in dollars, divided by the property price, times 100. A $2,500 assessment on a $1,000,000 property is 0.25%, which is the default.

Land tax thresholds and headline rates by state and territory
StateTax-free thresholdAbove the threshold
NSW$1,075,000$100 + 1.6%
VIC$50,000Tiered scale
QLD$600,000$500 + 1.0%
WA$300,000$300, then 0.25%
SA$936,0000.5%
TAS$125,000$50 + 0.45%
ACTNo threshold$1,778 + 0.54–1.26%
NTNo land tax—

Thresholds and rates as published by each revenue office, checked September 2026. They change, usually annually, so follow the link before relying on them. Figures shown are the general rates for individuals.

ETF portfolio defaults

5.2% nominal ETF capital growth. This includes inflation and excludes ETF income. At the 2.5% inflation default it represents about 2.63% real capital growth before fees.

2.8% income yield. ETF income is modelled separately from capital growth. The gross income assumption includes the benefit of any franking credits because those credits form part of an investor’s total return.

0.75% all-in ETF portfolio fees. This includes the assumed cost of portfolio management, brokerage and underlying ETF management expense ratios (MERs). It is deducted from the combined capital growth and income return. No additional portfolio fee is deducted elsewhere.

7.25% total return after fees. Under the defaults this is 5.2% capital growth plus 2.8% income, less 0.75% all-in fees. This is before tax and inflation.

Income is reinvested after tax. Gross ETF income is taxed at the selected marginal tax rate and the amount left is reinvested. The model assumes the gross income already captures franking credits but does not separately model foreign tax offsets or fund level capital gain distributions.

Single compounding investment. The ETF is intentionally modelled as one continuously compounding portfolio for this comparison rather than as individual tax parcels.

Tax and shared assumptions

Tax rules comparison. The tax rules selector changes only the tax treatment. It keeps the investment period, returns, costs, tax rate and financing assumptions the same. Within each scenario the ETF receives the same cash as the property. Total cash can differ between tax scenarios because tax treatment changes the property shortfall. Previous rules assumes negative gearing remains available throughout and eligible gains receive the 50% CGT discount once the 12 month holding requirement is met. The rules from 1 July 2027 use the date based transition settings modelled below.

2.5% inflation. This is used as a long term starting assumption. It increases rent and other property costs and is used to estimate CGT indexation where eligible.

39% default marginal tax rate. This represents a 37% marginal income tax rate plus the 2% Medicare levy. The income dropdown lets you select another bracket. The calculator assumes an Australian resident individual investing personally.

30% minimum CGT rate under the new rules. Eligible gains accruing from 1 July 2027 use the higher of the selected marginal rate or the 30% minimum rate. If you know you qualify for an exemption you can select the exemption option. This setting isn’t used in the previous rules comparison.

1 July 2027 CGT transition under the new rules. For investments held across this date, the model estimates the gain accrued before the change separately from the indexed gain after the change. For property, the automatic method estimates the 1 July 2027 value from the purchase price and selected property growth. You can instead enter your own estimated market value at that date. This transition isn’t applied in the previous rules comparison.

Established property and negative gearing under the new rules. For an established property bought after 12 May 2026, rental losses can reduce salary income until 1 July 2027. Later losses are quarantined and can reduce future residential income and residential capital gains. For simplicity, every acquisition dated 12 May 2026 is treated as grandfathered. Acquisitions from 13 May 2026 are not. Under the previous rules comparison, negative gearing remains available throughout.

Eligible new builds under the new rules. Selecting this option means the calculator assumes the property satisfies the relevant eligibility requirements. Rental losses continue to receive negative gearing treatment. At sale the model compares the 50% CGT discount with the new indexation method and uses the lower estimated CGT amount. Under the previous rules comparison, new and established properties use the same negative gearing and CGT settings.

What isn’t modelled. ETF income is taxed at your marginal rate as a single gross figure. Franking credits are assumed to be inside that figure, but foreign tax offsets, capital gain distributions, tax deferred distributions, AMIT cost base adjustments and portfolio turnover are not modelled separately. Negative gearing benefits are credited monthly rather than after an annual tax return, which flatters the ETF result by roughly 0.03% at most. One marginal tax rate applies for the whole period, so changes in income, retirement or tax brackets are not reflected. LMI deductibility, loan establishment costs and refinancing costs are excluded.

Capital works. Renovation and capital works are treated as a cash cost and added to the property CGT cost base. Works paid after 1 July 2027 are indexed from the month they are paid. Any increase in the property’s market value from those works is not modelled, so the property result is conservative on that point.

Surplus cash. Where rent exceeds all costs, the property hands cash back. The ETF option sells units to release the same amount, reducing its cost base proportionally and realising CGT at the time. If the portfolio is exhausted the two options stop receiving the same cash and a warning is shown.

Monthly modelling. Cash flows are modelled monthly. Results use simplifying assumptions, so actual tax outcomes can differ from a formal valuation, ATO treatment or your personal circumstances.

Important information

The Stockspot property versus ETF calculator shows how different assumptions may affect the estimated value of an investment property compared with an ETF portfolio. The results are estimates only and actual amounts may be higher or lower. Stockspot can’t predict other factors that may affect your decision, including changes in interest rates, investment returns, property prices, rents, costs, tax rules or inflation. This calculator shouldn’t be your sole source of information when making a financial decision.

Assumptions: The comparison uses the selected purchase and sale dates and the same upfront cash for both options. Every dollar of ongoing after-tax external cash required by the property is also invested into the ETF option, including principal repayments and optional major works. Where the property instead produces surplus cash, the ETF option sells units to release the same amount, reducing its cost base proportionally and realising CGT at that time. Property and ETF capital growth assumptions are nominal, include inflation and exclude their respective income yields. Inflation isn’t added to those growth rates again. Property return after ongoing costs is calculated as nominal capital growth plus rent after vacancy, less first-year property costs. Property costs grow with inflation, not property capital growth. ETF total return after fees is calculated as capital growth plus income, less the selected all-in fee. ETF income is assumed to include the benefit of franking credits. Income tax and CGT are modelled separately. Major works are included as cash outgoings and added to the property’s CGT cost base, though any market value uplift from those works isn’t modelled. The tax rules selector is a simplified scenario comparison. The calculator doesn’t account for every deduction, state tax, depreciation, capital loss, ownership structure or personal circumstance.

Investing in financial products and property involves risk. Past performance isn’t an assurance of future performance. This calculator provides general information only and doesn’t take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. It isn’t personal financial, tax or legal advice. Consider speaking with a registered tax adviser or licensed financial adviser before making a decision.

Questions?
We're here to help

Sarah

Sarah King

Head of Client Care
& Advice

The calculator compares an investment property with a diversified ETF portfolio using the same starting cash. For property, the starting cash can cover the deposit and upfront buying costs. If the property requires additional out-of-pocket contributions over time, the calculator assumes the same amounts are invested into the ETF portfolio. This creates a more consistent comparison between the two scenarios.

ETFs trade on the share market and can hold hundreds or thousands of investments in a single fund. Rather than assuming an investor selects individual companies, the calculator uses a diversified ETF portfolio to represent share market investing. This allows it to compare one investment property with a broadly diversified portfolio rather than relying on the performance of selected companies.

The deposit affects how much of your starting cash is used upfront and how much needs to be borrowed. A smaller deposit generally means a larger mortgage and higher interest costs. You can change the deposit assumption to see how it affects the estimated outcome.

Yes. The property calculation can include the mortgage, rental income, upfront buying costs and ongoing property expenses. You can change the available inputs to reflect the property you're considering, including the purchase price, deposit, interest rate, rent, capital growth and holding period.

The calculator estimates tax during the investment period and potential capital gains tax when the property or ETF portfolio is sold, based on the assumptions and methodology used. Actual tax outcomes depend on your income, investments and personal circumstances. The results are estimates only and aren't personal tax advice.

You can adjust inputs such as the property price, deposit, interest rate, rental income, property growth, ETF return and investment period. Changing the assumptions can help you understand which factors have the greatest effect on the estimated outcome.

Yes. The property scenario includes borrowing based on the deposit and mortgage assumptions entered. Borrowing can magnify gains when a property rises in value. It can also magnify losses and increase the effect of interest costs. The calculator accounts for property borrowing when comparing the property and ETF scenarios.

No. The results are estimates based on the information and assumptions entered. Actual property prices, investment returns, interest rates, rental income, costs and tax outcomes may differ. The calculator provides general information only. It shouldn't be treated as a prediction or personal financial, tax, lending or property advice.

Investing in ETFs yourself vs automated by Stockspot

Buying ETFs is easy.
Building the right portfolio is harder.

Stockspot is Australia's first and largest online investment adviser specialising in ETFs.

We can help set up and manage an ETF portfolio tailored for your goals.

See how our model ETF portfolios outperformed 100% of comparable diversified funds over the 10 years to 30 June 2026. See details here →.

Past performance of financial products is no guarantee of future performance. View methodology below ^

How Stockspot helps you invest in ETFs

A portfolio built around you

We recommend a personalised portfolio based on your scenario and risk exposure.

From conservative to aggressive growth - tailored to you.

Simple, all-in-one fee

Our fees start at $1 per month for portfolios under $20,000, or 0.39% to 0.66% p.a. for larger portfolios.

Learn more about pricing →

Support that feels personal

You get digital convenience, plus access to a local team who understands your account. Qualified support when you need it with no call centre model.

Get your portfolio in four easy steps

Stockspot is Australia's first and largest online investment adviser specialising in ETFs. We set up and manage an ETF portfolio tailored to your goals. There's no paperwork and no need to be an expert.